The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Analysis of Current Globalization
In an globalized universe, the dialogue on globalization is often positioned at the intersection of contradictory views on freedom and justice. The book by the author Junon Moneta, far from being a manifesto against globalization per se, seeks to reinvent the contours of a new humanism via the perspective of natural exchanges as envisioned by Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that strengthen modern systems of oppression and precarity, Moneta leans on ancient principles to underline the gaps of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalization is not a new phenomenon. Its beginnings can be traced back to the theories of the economist Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the United Kingdom to extend its global trade power. However, what was originally a economic growth opportunity has morphed into a control mechanism by global finance, characterized by the rise of economic liberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, the book demonstrates that the neoliberal system is truly a framework based on old customs, which traces back to 4500 years.
The objection also extends to the administration of the EU, considered as a chain of surrenders that have helped consolidate the authority of large economic groups as opposed to safeguarding the rights of citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its policies frequently driven by monetary concerns rather than by a democratic mandate, is questioned. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only intensified the disbelief of the writer concerning Europe’s aptitude to change intrinsically.
The author, while admitting the past mistakes that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also proposes solutions aimed at redefining European policies in a equity-oriented and humanistic vision. The urgent need for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a recurring subject that pervades the whole text.
The text dives more intensely into the questioning of the power structures that govern worldwide transactions. The analysis covers the method in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a small group of financial influencers, often at the detriment of the population. This economic elite, manipulated by means of institutions like the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a excessive domination on global financial decisions.
The writer reveals how these organisms, claiming to monetary management and security, have throughout history shaped stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far removed from a emancipatory solution to classic financial limitations, is described as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the expense of general well-being.
Strongly opposed about the administration of the single currency, the critic depicts the European single currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but as being a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The adoption of the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated citizens from decision-making processes, while aggravating gaps between nations within the EU.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the increase in national debts, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has weakened living standards across the continent. The critic emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the Union remains vulnerable to upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In essence, the manuscript demands a democratic uprising where Europe’s inhabitants reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It advocates institutional adjustments, notably increased transparency in decision-making processes and real democratic participation that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
My source about plus d’infos
The author suggests that the solution lies in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.